Quote
"

What men mean when they talk about their “crazy” ex-girlfriend is often that she was someone who cried a lot, or texted too often, or had an eating disorder, or wanted too much/too little sex, or generally felt anything beyond the realm of emotionally undemanding agreement. That does not make these women crazy. That makes those women human beings, who have flaws, and emotional weak spots. However, deciding that any behavior that he does not like must be insane– well, that does make a man a jerk.

And when men do this on a regular basis, remember that, if you are a woman, you are not the exception. You are not so cool and fabulous and levelheaded that they will totally get where you are coming from when you show emotions other than “pleasant agreement.”

When men say “most women are crazy, but not you, you’re so cool” the subtext is not, “I love you, be the mother to my children.” The subtext is “do not step out of line, here.” If you get close enough to the men who say things like this, eventually, you will do something that they do not find pleasant. They will decide you are crazy, because this is something they have already decided about women in general.

"

Lady, You Really Aren’t “Crazy” (via sparkamovement)

(via gadgetry)

Photo
downlo:

A useful rape analogy

downlo:

A useful rape analogy

(via erikamoen)

Photo
Link

Girls swept all three age categories in the competition, a contrast to generations past when women were largely excluded from the science world.

“Personally I think that’s amazing, because throughout my entire life, I’ve heard science is a field where men go into,” Ms. Bose said. “It just starts to show you that women are stepping up in science, and I’m excited that I was able to represent maybe just a little bit of that.” She will start her senior year of high school in the fall.

The research these girls did is amazing. I am a science major myself, and I will say it is always depressing to realize how few women are in the major and field that I work in. I am not posting this because it explicitly relates to gender, but just because it made me happy to hear about girls sweeping the science fair.

Link

gadgetry:

teallikethecolor:

jeuxdeau:

thenjw | que-decir:

The romances in the game are not for “the straight male gamer”. They’re for everyone. We have a lot of fans, many of whom are neither straight nor male, and they deserve no less attention.

I love you, BioWare.

it looks pretty much like bioware loves you back.

“And if there is any doubt why such an opinion might be met with hostility, it has to do with privilege. You can write it off as “political correctness” if you wish, but the truth is that privilege always lies with the majority. They’re so used to being catered to that they see the lack of catering as an imbalance. They don’t see anything wrong with having things set up to suit them, what’s everyone’s fuss all about? That’s the way it should be, any everyone else should be used to not getting what they want. … And the person who says that the only way to please them is to restrict options for others is, if you ask me, the one who deserves it least. And that’s my opinion, expressed as politely as possible.”

Slow clap.

Link

gadgetry:

et-tu-dionysus:

[trigger warning on the article]
nefariousnewt
:

onebigpear:

drmonkeyface:

turn-on-the-neon:

I’m literally shaking in anger and disgust. 

If you have the time, please. 

Signed, and shared.

Done.

Signed it earlier but forgot to reblog.

Tumblr, you know what to do.

The tone of this article really is unforgivable.

this is horrifying. every single part of this is horrifying.

(Source: kitteh-neon)

Link

projectqueer:

BBC Radio 1 DJ Scott Mills was in Uganda recently filming a show called “The World’s Worst Place to be Gay?” where he met with M.P. David Bahati, the sponsor of the draconian Anti-Homosexuality Bill (a.k.a. the “Kill the Gays” Bill) that is still before that nation’s Parliament.

During Mills’s encounter with Bahati, Mills confessed that he was gay.

That’s when, according to Mills, Bahati “went mental“:

He explained: “He was scary. He ordered us to cut the cameras then brought a security guard. We ran off and he rang one of our guys saying, ‘Where are they staying? What are the registration plates? I want them arrested. They won’t get far’.”

Fortunately Scott’s colleague lied about their location, and armed police arrived at the Sheraton – where they had been falsely told the team were staying. The DJ continued: “I’d heard horror stories about people getting arrested and roughed up and who knows what. I was scared.”

(Source: queerwatch)

Photo
equalitopia:

ACLU and Yale launch campaign to stop censoring LGBT websites in schools
ACLU has teamed up with Yale Law School to launch the “Don’t Filter Me” campaign, which aims to stop censorship of websites in public high schools.
The ACLU blog post reports that some schools have been blocking LGBT-related websites such as the GSA Network and the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).
These schools even allow students to access to anti-LGBT sites that condemn LGBT people or urge LGBT people to try to change our sexual orientation. The ACLU describes this as viewpoint discrimination.
ACLU asks students to report unconstitutional web filtering at their schools by filling out a form at action.aclu.org/dontfilterme.
(Image credit: aclu.org)

equalitopia:

ACLU and Yale launch campaign to stop censoring LGBT websites in schools

ACLU has teamed up with Yale Law School to launch the “Don’t Filter Me” campaign, which aims to stop censorship of websites in public high schools.

The ACLU blog post reports that some schools have been blocking LGBT-related websites such as the GSA Network and the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN).

These schools even allow students to access to anti-LGBT sites that condemn LGBT people or urge LGBT people to try to change our sexual orientation. The ACLU describes this as viewpoint discrimination.

ACLU asks students to report unconstitutional web filtering at their schools by filling out a form at action.aclu.org/dontfilterme.

(Image credit: aclu.org)

(via projectqueer)

Link

projectqueer:

On Tuesday, the Indiana House passed a constitutional ban on gay marriage for the second time.

The measure, House Joint Resolution 6, amends the original bill from 2005 and passed 70-26 with votes from all but one Republican and 11 Democrats, according to indystar.com. Though gay marriage is already illegal in Indiana, this would write a ban on gay marriage and any relationship “substantially similar” into the state constitution

The bill now advances to the state Senate. If approved, it will take another three years before the constitution is changed, as the constitution needs approval from two consecutive and separately elected legislatures. If the General Assembly adopts the resolution this year, it would have to do so again in 2013 or 2014 in order for the resolution to be placed on the 2014 ballot, according to WSBT . It will not be easy, if the Democrats regain control of the House and Senate in the meantime.

Rep. Eric Turner (R-Marion), who wrote the resolution, said, “The basic unit of society is the family, and the cornerstone of the family is marriage. Marriage is and should be between one man and one woman.” Turner believes the constitutional ban will prevent the state Supreme Court from overturning anti-gay marriage laws, as happened in Iowa courts.

Critics think this ban will instigate hate crimes and discrimination. “One of the most important things a state or federal constitution does, what it’s supposed to do, is protect the minority…from the tyranny of the majority,” Rep. Matt Pierce (D-Bloomington) said on Indystar.com.

Link

woooods:

“…a troubling gender difference in attributional style. That is, boys are more likely than girls to attribute their failures to lack of effort, and girls are more likely than boys to attribute their failure to lack of ability. Carol Dweck and her colleagues have found that this difference results in part from boys and girls being subtly taught different ways to interpret both their successes and their failures (Dweck, et. al 1978). They observed teachers’ feedback patterns in fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms and found that despite the fact that girls, on average, outperform boys in school, negative evaluations of girls’ performance were almost exclusively restricted to intellectual inadequacies. In contrast, 45% of the criticism of boys’ work referred to nonintellectual factors… Dweck and her colleagues argue from these data that girls learn that criticism means they lack ability, whereas boys learn that criticism means that they haven’t worked hard enough or paid enough attention to detail” (Gilovich, 2011)